Skip to main content

The Beast of Yucca Flats (1961)


There comes a point in every horror fan's life where they come face to face with a beast so bad... so horrific... so ill conceived that they wonder how it could've possibly been brought forth.  "The Beast of Yucca Flats" is one of those points in my life.

While fleeing Soviet agents, scientist Joseph Javorsky is caught in the explosion of an atomic bomb.  The blast transform him into a beast that rampages across the countryside... with the authorities on his trail...

"The Beast of Yucca Flats" has been described by some critics as being far worse than Ed Wood's infamous "Plan 9 From Outer Space"- with good reason.

Since the dialogue wasn't recorded at the same time as it was filmed, it was put into a rather bad position to begin with.  Every spoken word and sound effect was added in post production.  Rather than matching the dialogue with the mouths of the actors, the scenes are edited so that you can't see the speaker's mouth... or they're off screen when talking.  The dialogue is also limited- replaced mostly with a voice over narrator... who speaks in cliches and enigmatic phrases that are probably meant to seem deep and profound.  I found them somewhat nonsensical and irrelevant to the story in most cases.

I can't say the acting is bad, since there really isn't much in the way of acting.  Tor Johnson- who plays the beast, and is a cult horror icon for his B-movie roles, does the most acting... and even then there isn't a lot of it.  Mostly waving his arms and shambling across the scenery.  His best scene- and one that actually made me smile was when he enters a cave where he'd left a dead woman earlier.  He discovers that the cops had found and removed her body.  The narrator intones, "Finding his victim gone, the beast unleashes its fury..." and Johnson howls and tosses a rock the size of his head before laying down for a nap.  Now that's fury!

To be honest, I hardly found The Beast to be scary.  The extent of  Javorsky's transformation was some make-up that looked more like someone smeared some oatmeal, or something similar on the actor's face, and ripped his shirt a bit.

The story wasn't very engaging... nor did it make much sense- especially the opening scene.  The movie starts with a murder (supposedly by The Beast), but nowhere is there time for The Beast to commit the murder... nor is there any mention of this one.  When film historian Tom Weaver interviewed producer Anthony Cardoza, Cardoza said that the opening scene was added in post production simply because the director like nude scenes.  There isn't even that much nudity in it.

This film's only saving grace is that it's only 53 minutes long... but it's still and "Ugly" 53 minutes...

Comments

  1. This is supposed to be legendarily awful. But I would like to see it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's bad, man. Seriously bad. I'll bring it with "The Screaming Skull" and "The Killer Shrews". LOL

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Grave Questions: Jessica Cameron

February is " Women in Horror Month "- a month in which to celebrate the impact that women have had on the genre and the industry- from writing, to acting, to directing and producing. Jessica Cameron has experienced the industry in all those capacity- making her a perfect choice for me to ask some " Grave Questions " of in order to raise awareness of the great women in Horror. Please not that this article SHOULD'VE been posted in February, but due to technical difficulties, we're putting it up now.  Thank you. TCoT :   Which female horror stars helped to inspire you to not only enjoy the genre- but to get involved in bringing scary movies to the world? Jessica :  I literally said to my " Truth or Dare " producer, "If the Soska sisters can make " Dead Hooker in a Trunk " with nothing, then I can make " Truth or Dare ".  So needless to say that those girls have been a huge inspiration in everything I do behind the

Meridian: Kiss of the Beast (1990)

Sometimes, a director/producer will surprise you- such was the case during " Terrorpolooza 2012 " when I watched Charles Band's " Meridian: Kiss of the Beast " Catherine Bomarzini has come home after her father's death.  Needing company, she asks Gina to stay with her.  Soon, the two meet a wondering troupe of performers that Catherine invites to dinner at her castle. Catherine find herself pulled into a love triangle and an ancient curse that only she can break. After watching movies like " Evil Bong ", and " Demonic Toys ", I really wasn't expecting too much from this Charles Band movie- but I was pleasantly surprised by it. The story is actually quite interesting with lots of potential for eerie scenes, and character development.  It's a nice twist on the classic " Beauty and the Beast " story.  It's a bit slower than most of Band's other works, but moves smoothly and draws you with it. I have to ad

The Phantom of the Opera

  Not too long ago, I reviewed the silent horror classic, "Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror", and wound up being in the mood to view a few other of the silent horror films in my collection.  The next one I watched was "The Phantom of the Opera", starring Lon Chaney, Sr, and released in 1925.   A mysterious stranger has been threatening the star singer of the Paris Opera House- someone who has signs his letters simply as, "The Phantom".  This stranger wants to clear the way so his protege, Christine Daae can ascend to stardom herself.  Soon, her love for the Comte de Chagny collides with The Phantom's desire for Christine forcing both to take drastic actions in order to be with the one they love. " The Phantom of the Opera " actually underwent three periods of re-shoots and editing, due to poor reception and test viewings.  In 1930, a sound version was created- often assumed to be what is called "The Eastman House Print".  It is